Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in choose juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases can be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
For a society, it is actually essential to continue striving for just a just legal system that guarantees fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been with the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion can be regarded, however, we are crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy matter to your approval with the competent authority.
It is now perfectly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different, therefore, in our view the discovered Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner because of the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the target.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is actually a regulation that is based on precedents, that will be the judicial decisions from previous cases, alternatively than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Please note, When you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Criminal cases In the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions check here in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.
This article delves into the intricacies from the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to provide a comprehensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.